Obama: ATMs are the cause of high unemployment!

Just when you think you’ve heard it all, Barack Obama once again revels us with another ridiculous statement. If incompetence and stupidity were currency, there is no doubt in my mind that Barack Obama would be the richest man in the world. Just my opinion….William McCullough

The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt….Bertrand Russell

Barack Obama Thinks an ATM Ate Your Job

Eric Erickson – Red State.com, June 15, 2011

Yesterday, Barack Obama gave away the game. Without actually using the words, Barack Obama admitted he is completely and utterly ignorant about job creation and economics. In an interview with the Today Show, Barack Obama declared that the unemployment rate remains so high because of ATMS.

Sadly, many people will agree with him because they lack the vision to see the whole picture. They see less bank tellers and more ATMs — much as Barack Obama does — and presume this must mean higher unemployment. This myth, and it is a myth, is older than even the great lament that cars put blacksmiths on the unemployment line by getting rid of the need for horse shoes.

This left-wing populist thinking does not create jobs and often leads to dangerous policies that stifle the innovation that create the jobs that spring forth from the ATM’s replacing the bank tellers. Barack Obama sees less tellers at the banks because of ATM’s. But he does not see new IT workers at the bank to manage the ATM — higher paid than the tellers. He does not see the computer programmers. He does not see the manufacturers of the machines and their component parts.

Barack Obama should read Henry Hazlitt’s Economics in One Lesson. The book was written in 1945 and debunks Obama’s myth succinctly. K. E. Campbell links to the relevant portion:


Among the most viable of all economic delusions is the belief that machines on net balance create unemployment. Destroyed a thousand times, it has risen a thousand times out of its own ashes as hardy and vigorous as ever. Whenever there is a long-continued mass unemployment, machines get the blame anew. This fallacy is still the basis of many labor union practices…The belief that machines cause unemployment…leads to preposterous conclusions. Not only must we be causing unemployment with every technological improvement we make today, but primitive man must have started causing it with the first efforts he made to save himself from needless toil and sweat…

For starters, this Obama comment really is odd when he wants the government to subsidize the production of electric cars, which would destroy whole sectors of the economy centered around gas fueled cars. If he believes ATM’s destroy jobs, why does he want to subsidize government innovation in green jobs, which would destroy other jobs? Of course, the answer to that is that he wants to destroy the other sectors.

There, in fact, is the most important and revelatory bit of this whole statement. Barack Obama premises his world view that innovation kills jobs. But, Barack Obama wants to innovate and advance technology in certain areas of the economy, e.g. government and green jobs. Therefore, we can conclude based on his own presuppositions about innovation that Barack Obama is intending to kill off sectors of the economy by forcing government to fund innovation in other areas of the economy.

It all makes sense now, even though it is an ignorant and wrong presupposition.

Machines do not cause unemployment. They just move employment elsewhere — from the bank teller line to the IT line to the manufacturing line, etc.

What’s more troubling about Barack Obama’s statement though — and the White House doubling down on it — is that it leads to one of two conclusions, both of which are horribly wrong.

The first conclusion is that we should get rid of technology, declaring a veritable Butlerian Jihad. Doing so would cause companies to allocate resources more inefficiently, which might increase the labor pool in one sector of the economy, but assuredly wipe it out in another.

The second conclusion is that we must settle for this. It is arguable that we are in a period of stagnation with regard to innovation, invention, and technological progress. But settling for this as fact will most likely lead the government to take public policy steps to strengthen and expand the social safety net to compensate for lost jobs than to get government out of the way and fire up the private sector to move beyond the stagnation and innovation plateau.

We can see already that Barack Obama has decided to go with the second option — to accept a decline and prepare for the decay caused by the decline instead of taking proactive steps to get the economy firing up again.

Barack Obama shows himself to be clearly ignorant of the way a free market economy works and innovates. Consequently, his economy policy is founded on that ignorance, accepts as gospel the decline of the United States, and, until he is replaced, we’re screwed.



About admin

Navy and Marine Corps Veteran, B.A. Cum Laude, International Relations - Public Administration, Law Enforcement background, Dignatary - Executive Protection, Threat Assessment - Security Consultant.
This entry was posted in Political Public Opinion and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Obama: ATMs are the cause of high unemployment!

  1. Paul says:

    Harrison – another famous analogy…

    An American businessman was touring China. His tour guide showed him an earthen dam being built by 100 Chinese laborers using hand shovels. The American asked “Why don’t you just use 1 man and a bulldozer to get this dam built in a day?” The Chinese tour guide responded “If we did that then we’d have 99 men out of work.” To which the American replied “Oh, I thought you were making a dam. If your goal is to make jobs why don’t you take their shovels away and replace them with spoons.”

    • Harrison says:

      Yes this is the truth.

    • The Sarcastic Cynic says:

      From the start I knew there were no shovel ready jobs in this country since there were no shovels being imported from China. As for Barry Bank Teller Obama’s assertion that those mean old ATM’s are supporting high unemployment, what politician, marxist or otherwise, could or would utter such dribble if there was not a populace with the inability to discern shit from shinola? I predict a landslide win if not a mandate for Obama in 2012.

  2. Harrison says:

    The comment was stupid on its face but what I find more disturbing is Obama seems to believe that ATMs – which have been around for 25 years or more – are bad for society because they can replace a banker. Maybe instead of nail guns the construction industry should hire more people to use hammers or instead of drilling machines we should just get more people with pick axes.

Comments are closed.