Political Public Opinion: Doublespeak Term For The New Mellinnium – Deficit Nuetral

by

William McCullough

“ All governments are run by liars and nothing they say should be believed.”

I.F. Stone

Be fruitful and prosperous my brothers!

Doublespeak (sometimes called doubletalk) is any language that deliberately disguises, distorts, or reverses the meaning of words, resulting in a communication bypass. Doublespeak may take the form of euphemisms (e.g., “downsizing” for layoffs); intentional ambiguity; or the reversal of meaning (for example, calling war “peace”, or maintaining the status quo “change”). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doublespeak

The term “deficit neutral” can be described as the perfect example of doublespeak. President Obama, front man for the international “shadow” financiers, has used the term “deficit neutral,” ad-nauseum in a campaign of “intentional ambiguity,”designed to deceive the American people. To break it down in it’simplest form. If you are going to spend money on a program like health care which is an entitlement you need to have a money source, ie, the taxpayer. Once the taxpayer has been scammed out of his money the entitlement becomes anything but deficit neutral. The administrations play on words would have you believe that by increasing your taxes they would not incur additional debt to fund their health care reform program; in reality your personal debt would be increased by having your cash flow diminished to pay for the government entitlement.

At this point, to refute any negative connotation attached to that idea, the government, (in this case the Obama administration), would try to convince you that having the entitlement financed in this way would save you, the taxpayer, money in your health care costs. However, in  addition to your tax contribution, they will also cut funding in other areas, ie, medicare, to help finance the new “reform” entitlement at the expense of another segment of the population being robbed of their entitlement; senior citizens. Another words robbing Peter to pay Paul. Senior citizens by not having availability of their prior health care entitlement would then be forced to pay premiums for medical care that had previously been subsidized. They would then have an increased deficit in their spending which would be anything but “neutral.”

To further extrapolate the “big lie,”  insurance companies would finance their so called “shortfalls” from lowered premiums, from you, by charging the government directly for their so called increased cost of doing business. The government ever inept in money management would then further increase taxes to pay the “increased” cost of health care through more taxation, creating more of a deficit in your personal cash flow. Additionally health care providers who by this time will be forced into the Cuban compensation model, (poverty level wages), will themselves forced to find ever more ways to fraud the system in order to maintain their personal standard of living. The government, as has been proven in the past, would ignore the corruption and once again increase your taxes in order to fund the by then, institutionalized corruption in he system. Of course the bureaucrats charged with controlling that corruption would themselves, as has been their habit since thus far,  join in on the corruption. The end result will be massive corruption and unsustainable costs which would bankrupt the system itself as well as you in the process.

If that tortured explanation which I have offered in the above diatribe is too confusing then look at the health care reform scam  another way: it will cheat you out of your hard earned money to finance a massive socialist program that will suck you dry with increased taxation which will result in your personal deprivation and increase your debt to the government. That my friends is anything but “deficit neutral.  Just my opinion.